| 9th Cir finds no-match letter insufficient to put employer on constructive notice of illegality |
|
|
| Monday, 16 June 2008 | |||||
|
Aramark v. SEIU (9th Cir. 6/16/08) HALL TGNelson Silverman The 9th Cir held that a "no match" letter from the Social Security Administration did not put an employer on "constructive notice" that their employees were unauthorized to work. It held that the arbitrator's award did not contravene public policy, because there are many other possible explanations for no-match letters, and it also held that employers 3-day response period was too short. It therefore upheld the arbitrator's award of reinstatement.
Powered by !JoomlaComment 3.12 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved. |
|||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|






