| 

The National Immigrant Justice Center's experienced legal staff can speak about the legal ramifications of immigration laws, provide analysis of how immigration policies play out in immigrant communities, and help put reporters in touch with immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers who can provide a human face to stories about the U.S. immigration system.


NIJC Press contact:
Tara Tidwell Cullen

 


Home arrow General Immigration arrow 9th Cir: atty cannot threaten to withdraw to force client to take VD

9th Cir: atty cannot threaten to withdraw to force client to take VD Print E-mail
Thursday, 31 July 2008

Rawshan Nehad v. Mukasey (9th Cir. 7/31/08)

POLLACK (dct), WFletcher, Gould

Petitioner's former counsel threatened to withdraw 2 hours before a hearing (for personal reasons), unless he gave up his asylum claim and took VD. He did, but then sought reopening and complied with Lozada. The CtApp found that (1) where personal circumstances make it difficult to continue as counsel, an atty has a duty to withdraw in a way that won't harm the client; and (2) only the client, not atty, can settle the case; attys may not coerce settlement or withdraw because settlement is declined. CtApp found prejudice, noting potential asylum claim as to Afghanistan, and as to whether the state court had permitted him to withdraw his guilty plea only for immigration reasons, or whether his insanity had something to do with it.

Read opinion here: 

Comments
Add NewSearch
Write comment
Name:
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
 
Security Image
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved.

 
< Prev   Next >