| 

Heartland Alliance's National Immigrant Justice Center's experienced legal staff can speak about the legal ramifications of immigration laws, provide analysis of how immigration policies play out in immigrant communities, and help put reporters in touch with immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers who can provide a human face to stories about the U.S. immigration system.


NIJC Press contact:
Tara Tidwell Cullen

 


Home arrow General Immigration arrow 1st Cir rejects adverse credibility, but affirms on "implicit" alternate no past persecution ground

1st Cir rejects adverse credibility, but affirms on "implicit" alternate no past persecution ground Print E-mail
Thursday, 10 July 2008

Wiratama v. Mukasey (1st Cir. 7/9/08)

CUDAHY Lynch Torruella

The 1st Cir first overturned the IJ's adverse credibility finding - holding that the IJ improperly lept from an immaterial contradiction that didn't really exist anyway, to an adverse credibility finding.  The Court found that substantial evidence didn't support that finding.

However, the CtApp affirmed on an alternate ground. CtApp acknowledged that the alternate ground had to be decided by the agency, per Chenery.  However, it found an "implicit" alternate ground in the IJ's decision, that past mistreatment didn't rise to the level of persecution.  It found most mistreatment was mere harassment; and that incidents were isolated.  Also, evidence tended to undercut his fears, i.e., his parents still reside in Indonesia and he returned there after departing.

Read opinion here: 

Comments
Add NewSearch
ben casper   | 75.134.157.140 | 2008-07-10 11:33:36
wow. a totally botched decision. The IJ rejected the past persecution claim based on his flawed credibility analysis. It seems likely the IJ would have found past persecution had he believed the story of the severe Jan '88 beating (mob attacks screaming racial epithets, severely beats guy, and slashes him with knife in arm while trying to do even more serious harm!) The court's reasoning there is way off on past persecution and completely misses the shifting burden issue. Matter of DIM would require remand here it seems. Horrible. Hope he petitions for rehearing.
Write comment
Name:
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
 
Security Image
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved.

 
< Prev   Next >