News and views on immigration law and policy.
Raids
Government Raids Traumatize American Children | Government Raids Traumatize American Children |
|
|
| Thursday, 01 November 2007 | |
|
One of the main problems with the U.S. immigration detention and deportation system is the lack of government transparency that keeps the public from truly understanding what happens during and following an immigration raid. A report released this week provides concrete analysis and data and one clear conclusion: raids hurt children.
According to the report, Paying the Price: The Impact of Immigration Raids on America's Children, approximately 5 million U.S. citizen children have at least one undocumented parent. A lot of young American lives are at stake.
The report was published by the National Council of La Raza and The Urban Institute and focuses on three sites where major raids that have occurred in the last year: Greeley, Colorado, and Grand Island, Nebraska, where ICE raided Swift & Co. meatpacking plants in December 2006 as part of a national enforcement action that detained more than 1,200 people; and New Bedford, Massachusetts, where hundreds of children were abandoned when more than 300 adults were detained in a raid on Michael Bianco, Inc., a government-contracted manufacturer of military backpacks.
Among the report's findings:
This inhumane treatment of children-depriving them of their caretakers and basic needs and subjecting them to mental trauma-goes against the principle of protecting the best interests of the child, which has long been a part of America's laws and policies. As the report states, "the question is not whether to enforce immigration laws but how."
Among The Urban Institute and NCLR's recommendations were a call for Congress to provide oversight of immigration enforcement activities and for ICE to take steps to protect the children that will inevitably be left alone after a raid. The groups also said that ICE should provide detainees access to counsel and ensure access to telephones. Other recommendations addressed steps schools, social service agencies, churches, immigration advocates, and immigrants should take to protect their communities' children. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|









